
Malignant Pleural Effusion With ZD6474
Lung CancerPleural EffusionThe goal of this clinical research study is to learn the effect of ZD6474 on the amount of time between placement of an indwelling pleural catheter and the catheter's removal in patients with malignant pleural effusion. This study will also look at the effect that ZD6474 has on tumor cells, biological characteristics of cells in the body, rate of fluid build-up around the lungs, tumor size, and thickness of blood vessels. The effect that this drug has on quality of life and shortness of breath will also be examined.

A Study of Sunitinib in Combination With Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel in Patients With...
Non-Small Cell Lung CancerThis is a Phase II, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial designed to provide a preliminary assessment of the safety and efficacy of sunitinib when combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy and bevacizumab in patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic NSCLC who have not received prior systemic therapy for NSCLC. All patients will have advanced, histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC (Stage IIIb with pleural effusions, Stage IV, or recurrent).

Cisplatin/Etoposide/Radiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Sorafenib for Inoperable Stage III Non-Small...
Non-Small Cell Lung CancerSorafenib has demonstrated in vivo anti-tumor efficacy. This trial will evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of sorafenib following chemoradiation in locally advanced NSCLC.

Vandetanib, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel in Treating Patients With Stage I, Stage II, or Stage III...
Lung CancerRATIONALE: Vandetanib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth and by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as carboplatin and paclitaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving vandetanib together with chemotherapy before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving vandetanib together with carboplatin and paclitaxel works in treating patients with stage I, stage II, or stage III non-small cell lung cancer that can be removed by surgery.

Erlotinib as First-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) for Patients Unfit...
Non Small Cell Lung CancerA phase II study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) and predictive markers as first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer for patients unfit for chemotherapy (NSCLC) Clinical Phase II Stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Primary end point: Disease control rate (= CR+PR and SD at 8 weeks /patients). Secondary end point: Safety (Serious Adverse Events, Adverse Events leading to premature withdrawal, unexpected TarcevaTM related AEs) .Correlation of EGFR expression rate (HER1) and FISH potentially predictive for response. An open-label, non randomized, multicenter, clinical trial of TarcevaTM as single agent The sample size is 29 patients in 2 stages and based on Simon´s optimal 2 stage design. Stage 1 will accrue 10 patients, if less than 1 response is observed the study will stop; if more than 1 response is observed the accrual will continue up till 29 patients. A total of 29 patients would be entered and the treatment will be declared to have sufficient activity to deserve further attention if at least 5 patients obtain disease control.

Pemetrexed and Cisplatin as Treatment in Small Cell Lung Cancer
Small Cell Lung CancerThe purpose of this study is to determine if cisplatin and pemetrexed are effective in the treatment of patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer, extended disease.

Role of a Silicone Prosthesis to Prevent Airway Obstruction Recurrence in Lung Cancers
Lung NeoplasmCarcinoma1 moreA tumoral obstruction of the main stem bronchus is frequently observed in the follow-up of lung cancers with a high impact on survival and quality of life of these patients. The endoluminal resection of these tumors through interventional bronchoscopy can remove the tumor but fails to prevent the recurrence. A stent insertion could achieve this goal but this option was never proved in a prospective protocol. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of stent insertion on the survival without symptoms of bronchial obstruction in patients treated for their cancer with and without a first line treatment (chemo-radiotherapy or chemotherapy). The patients will be included after resection of the endoluminal symptomatic tumoral obstruction. We will test the effect of the silicone stent insertion ( from NovatechR ) by comparing a stent arm (170 patients with stent insertion) with a control arm (170 patients without stent). The inclusion period will last 3 years with one year of follow-up for each patient. The one-year survival without symptomatic recurrence (proved on bronchoscopy with more than 50% of obstruction in the treated zone) will be the main endpoint. All patients without symptomatic recurrence at one year will be controlled endoscopically. Survival and stent tolerance will be studied as secondary endpoints. All endoscopic events will be depicted on photographs or videos. Each endoscopical situation (before and after resection, recurrence or side effects of stents) will be analyzed and registered by an independent committee of 3 international experts.

Chemotherapy or Observation in Treating Patients With Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Lung CancerRATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as vinorelbine, cisplatin, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and pemetrexed disodium, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Sometimes after surgery, the tumor may not need more treatment until it progresses. In this case, observation may be sufficient. It is not yet known whether chemotherapy is more effective than observation in treating patients who have undergone surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying four chemotherapy regimens to see how well they work compared with observation in treating patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

A Study of Nimotuzumab in Combination With Radiation Therapy in Patients With Brain Metastases
Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung CancerThis is a randomized, Phase II study designed to investigate Nimotuzumab plus whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT)and to compare it rith WBRT alone in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy of nimotuzumab in combination with WBRT.

Randomized, Multi-center, Open-label, Study of PR104 Versus PR104/Docetaxel in Non-Small Cell Lung...
Non-Small Cell Lung CancerThe current understanding of PR104 justifies the evaluation of PR104 with docetaxel in subjects with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). These include: Aldo-keto reductase 1C3 (AKR1C3). NSCLC has been shown to express high levels of AKR1C3 in about one half of tumors tested. Subjects with high levels of AKR1C3 should have increased activation of PR104 within their tumor. Hypoxia. NSCLC has been demonstrated to be a tumor with hypoxia based on both direct tumor measurements (oxygen electrodes) and hypoxic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Tumor hypoxia in NSCLC should be sufficient to activate PR104 to its active metabolites PR104H and PR104M. Preclinical data. The use of docetaxel and PR104 alone and in combination in preclinical models demonstrates activity of PR104 as a single agent and supraadditive activity when PR104 and docetaxel are used in combination. Manageable toxicity. PR104 and docetaxel with Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (G-CSF) have been combined in a prior phase I study. A Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) has been identified and the major toxicities of this combination are understood. The current study will provide an estimate of the activity of PR104 in subjects with NSCLC. This information will prove valuable in defining the future clinical development of PR104, and in determining if PR104 has sufficient activity in NSCLC to warrant a larger phase III registration study in this indication. Primary objectives • Estimate the response rate (RR) of PR104/docetaxel Secondary objectives Evaluate survival Evaluate progression free survival (PFS) Evaluate time to progression (TTP) Evaluate safety Evaluate the pharmacokinetics of PR104 and its metabolites Evaluate the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel Evaluate the tumor hypoxia using 18F-fluoromisonidazole (18F-MISO) PET imaging Collect diagnostic biopsy samples for the determination of AKR1C3 Collect plasma samples for assessment of potential biomarkers of tumor hypoxia