Active clinical trials for "Cancer Pain"

Assessing the safety and tolerability of Oxycodone Hydrochloride 50mg/mL in subjects with severe cancer pain.

The purpose of this study is to compare methadone with morphine in the management of moderate to severe cancer pain.

Primary Aims: To determine whether methadone used as first line strong opioid is superior to morphine as evidenced by reduced pain over a 12-week treatment period in patients with advanced cancer. Previous studies have demonstrated consistent improvement of pain control after opioid rotation from morphine to methadone. In addition, the pilot study showed that there was a trend towards lower pain intensity when methadone used as first line opioid as compared to morphine. Researchers postulate that due to its superior analgesic effects, methadone will result in better pain control over time as compared to morphine. To determine whether methadone used as first line strong opioid is superior to morphine as evidenced by reduced frequency of neurotoxicity, dose escalation and treatment failure over a 12-week treatment period. Previous studies have demonstrated that patients develop increased pain or neurotoxicity after chronic use of morphine and require frequent opioid escalation. Researchers postulate that methadone will demonstrate lower opioid induced neurotoxicity, less frequent dose escalation and less treatment failure over 12-week treatment period as compared to morphine. Secondary Aim: -To perform an economic evaluation, comparing the costs and clinical benefits of methadone and morphine. Researchers will perform an evaluation that incorporates both treatment and potential "downstream" costs, as well as an examination of clinical benefits that incorporate preferences, to perform an appropriate economic comparison. We postulate that methadone and its associated costs will be cheaper than morphine. However, if one strategy is both more expensive and clinically superior than the other, researchers are prepared to perform an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis. In that case, researchers expect to show that the greater pharmaceutical costs involved with morphine will make its use not be a cost-effective strategy.

The purpose of this study is to see whether injection of hydromorphone through a subcutaneous injection device is more effective in treating breakthrough cancer pain than oral morphine.

The purpose of this research study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of botulinum toxin A (Xeomin) ® injections in patients who suffer from focal pain in areas of radiation and/or surgery as a result of cancer treatment. Our hypothesis is that injection of incobotulinum toxin A into an area of local pain, at or around the area of a post-surgical/post radiation scar, relieves the focal cancer pain.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of NKTR-118 with placebo in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with cancer-related pain, including those patients that have inadequate response to laxative therapy (LIR). The study consists of 2 parts; A initial 4-week treatment period (part A) and then a 12 week extension with active treatment (part B).

The purpose of this study is to determine whether CG5503 (tapentadol) is effective and safe in the treatment of chronic tumor related pain compared to placebo.

The purpose of this study is to describe how often advanced cancer patients experience breakthrough pain (BTcP), and to describe how this pain is treated, and how effective these treatments are.

The purpose of this trial is the characterization of the long term safety profile and long-term dose requirements of tapentadol PR (prolonged release) in patients with malignant tumor-related pain. In the United States the prolonged-release formulation is also referred to as the extended-release formulation.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of SSR411298 200 mg daily compared to placebo as adjunctive treatment for persistent cancer pain based on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary Objectives are: To evaluate the effect of SSR411298 200 mg daily on pain, breakthrough pain frequency, background therapy utilization, mood, patient satisfaction of pain relief, nausea, constipation, healthcare utilization and quality of life; To evaluate the tolerability and safety of SSR411298 as adjunctive treatment for persistent cancer pain; To characterize patient disease, in terms of cancer, cancer treatment, cancer pain and cancer pain treatment; To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure of SSR411298 as adjunctive treatment for persistent cancer pain; To assess endocannabinoid plasma concentrations.