Active clinical trials for "Pancreatic Diseases"

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a challenging procedure itself, being even more complex and demanding in emergency settings. Only a few cases of emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy (EPD) are reported in medical literature, usually performed for complex pancreaticoduodenal lesions. EPD has first been mentioned in trauma settings, even fewer cases being reported for non-traumatic indications. The investigators intend to present our experience with this intervention, in a non-trauma surgical centre. Our study is a prospective consecutive case series, that included patients that underwent emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2014 to May 2021. Data was collected from the electronic system database. The investigators collected data regarding the demographic characteristics of the patients, their medical history, preoperative and postoperative investigations (including blood work and imagistic investigations), surgery related information and postoperative evolution.

The interpretation of Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP)-findings is primarily performed by radiologists who only in some cases have experience with the interpretation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-images. It is unclear if MRCP-interpretation by the radiologist is sufficient to decide which additional endoscopic procedures might be necessary in an individual case or if an additional MRCP-interpretation by the endoscopist renders any clinical impact.

The purpose of this study is to learn about how different types of carbohydrates used in infant formula may affect a baby's intestines and pancreas.

This is a prospective observational longitudinal study Aim of the study is to collect information: on the organization models of the Endoscopic Units performing ERCP in Italy on the previous and/or ongoing training of the endoscopists performing ERCP on the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing ERCP in Italy as well as on the outcome

The purpose of this research study is to collect data on the technical aspects of Lasparoscopy-assisted ERCP and patient outcomes to help guide future medical care of patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

Comparison of confocal laser endomicroscopic in vivo diagnosis and ex vivo examination against surgical histopathology of cystic pancreatic lesions.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a major surgery burdened by important morbidity and mortality partially related to the altered nutritional status of the patients. The perioperative malnutrition is a major risk factor of postoperative complications and worsens the prognosis of the patients. The perioperative artificial nutrition has for objectives to correct the preoperative malnutrition, and to maintain the nutritional status in the post-operative period. The current guidelines in surgery are in favour of a realisation of a perioperative artificial nutrition support that privilege the enteral nutrition. However, after pancreaticoduodenectomy, the total parenteral nutrition remains most usually used in the early postoperative period, although rare studies suggest a benefit of the enteral nutrition in term of reduction of the post-operative complications. Indeed, no recommendation was formulated concerning early enteral nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy because few studies were realized on its profits. The data of the literature report rates of complications (essentially major) from 49 % to 59 % after major digestive surgery (not only pancreatic) on patients having received a total parenteral nutrition versus rates from 34 to 43.8 % in patients having received an early enteral nutrition. A preliminary prospective study realized in the investigators centre showed a rate of 74 % complication versus 44 %, respectively in the total parenteral nutrition and early enteral nutrition groups (50 patients in every group, with p < 0.01. All the complications were listed prospectively). Hypothesis : The early enteral nutrition will allow, after pancreaticoduodenectomy, a decrease of, at least, 19 % complications of any stage according to the classification of Dindo-Clavien (59 % versus 40 %).

Obesity is a well-established risk factor for acute pancreatitis (AP). As for non-alcoholic fatty pancreas disease (NAFPD), it is evident that it is correlated with obesity. This is apparently the first study evaluating the association between NAFPD and severity of AP after taking into account several covariates.

One of the major roles of interventional EUS is biliary drainage (EUS-BD) as an alternative to ERCP-based biliary decompression. In fact, even when performed by expert endoscopists, ERCP-based stenting fails in 5% of cases. In these cases, standard alternative approaches include surgical bypass and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage (PTBD). However, these procedures are associated with higher patient discomfort and prolonged hospital stay. The most diffuse approach for EUS-BD are choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) or hepaticogastrostomy (HGS). As a matter of fact, since dedicate devices as lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS), have been adopted for CDS, we have been witnessing the escalation of such procedure. On the other hand, the diffusion of EUS-HGS is still limited due to the complexity of the procedure and the lack of dedicated devices. However, recently a dedicated stent was conceived as asymmetrically covered and shaped in order to have its uncovered, tubular end into the intrahepatic ducts and the covered, flanged end into the gastric cavity, to reduce the risk of migration. The developement of such stent could further increase both the technical feasibility and the clinical outcomes of HGS in order to explore the whole potential of this procedure and to definitively find its role in biliary drainage algorithm.

This is a prospective, phase II, single-centre, non-randomised, single-arm study, enrolling patients with benign and malignant bilio-pancreatic diseases with an indication to biliary or pancreatic plastic stent positioning during ERCP. On procedure day, the study team will confirm that the patient meets all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. The patient will undergo the ABS insertion and monitored and follow-up accordingly to biodegration variant.