Active clinical trials for "Peri-Implantitis"

Two groups are aimed at being investigated in three centers (CICOM, Clinica Branemark and Clinica Joan Pi) Test group: Group electrolytic approach (EA): Mechanical detoxification using curettes + NiTi brushes + EA (GalvoSurge) during 2 minutes Control group: Group hydrogen peroxide (HP): Mechanical detoxification using curettes + NiTi brushes + hydrogen peroxide 5% for 2 minutes soaked in a gauze Patients´ group selection will be randomly allocated. For patients whom their personal clinical record # ends in a number from 0 to 4 will be included in the test group, while for patients whom their personal clinical record # ends from 5-9 will be included in the control group. The infra-osseous component will be regenerated using xenograft (Creos, NB) + autogenous bone in a ratio 1:1 harvested from the adjacent area. A resorbable membrane (Creos, NB) will be placed to compartmentalize the infra-osseous component following a poncho-like approach.

A double-blind randomized-controlled clinical trial is conducted in order to evaluate the impact of non-surgical periodontal treatment on endothelial dysfunction parameters in subjects with peri-implantitis/peri-implant mucositis and without any cardiovascular disease.

A laser treatment for periimplantitis using two different wavelengths (Er:YAG and Nd:YAG) will be compared to standard treatment in a randomized clinical trial.

The purpose of the present study is to compare the 1-year clinical, radiographic and microbiological outcomes and patients' satisfaction following surgical treatment of peri-implantitis after applying two different surface modification methods. Secondarily, analysis and comparison of the microbiological results of implants diagnosed and treated for peri-implantitis with healthy implants will be performed.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare non-surgical treatment by mechanical debridement with air-polishing in peri-implantitis. The main question it aims to answer is: • Does non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis with an air-polishing devise (Perioflow® EMS, Nyon Switzerlad) provide a better treatment result than conventional cleaning with mechanical instruments? Participants will receive non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis either with mechanical debridement and with an air-polishing devise. Researchers will compare pocket depth and bleeding/suppuration on probing in implants treated with the two methods to see if either of them is more efficient in treatment of peri-implantitis.

The main aim of the present study is to investigate implant success rate after 5 years of function of immediate (Test group; within 7 days of implant placement) versus delayed (Control group; 8 weeks after implant placement) loading of two-pieces zirconia implant, placed in pristine bone without bone regeneration. Implant success rate will be defined according to Buser's criteria. Secondary endpoints: Marginal bone level (MBL) evaluation by means of standardized radiographs; Clinical evaluation of biological (e.g. Plaque Index, PI; Probing Pocket Depth, PPD, Bleeding on Probing, BOP; suppuration upon probing/palpation) and prosthetic/technical complications; Clinical evaluation of soft tissue width, keratinized tissue, marginal and interproximal soft tissue recession; Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) by questionnaire administration:

The aim of the research is to evaluate the clinical outcome of short dental implants, characterized by a new macro-structural design and inserted in the upper or lower jaw in patients with reduced bone volume. The clinical outcomes will be compared for different surface treatments of implant neck and those of prosthetic components.

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the potential benefit of the adjunctive use of an air-polishing device in the treatment of peri-implantitis as compared to mechanical infection control alone. Following establishment of adequate patient-performed infection control, 80 patients diagnosed with moderate/severe peri-implantitis at ≥1 implant will be randomized to one of two groups. Non-surgical and, if required, surgical therapy will be carried out by experienced operators in three clinical centers and the mechanical instrumentation (control group) will be supplemented by the use of air-polishing with erythritol powder (AirFlow Master, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) in the test group. The primary outcome assessed is "pocket closure" (ie probing pocket depth ≤5 mm & absence of profuse bleeding on probing) after non-surgical (6 months) and surgical therapy (18 months). Secondary outcomes include changes of clinical signs of soft tissue inflammation, adverse events and patient-reported outcome measures. Outcomes of non-surgical therapy will be evaluated at 3 and 6 months. Sites with remaining pathology at 6 months will be subjected to surgical therapy.

This controlled clinical trial will assess clinically, immunologically, and microbiologically the healing of experimental peri-implant mucositis (PIM) lesions in implants treated previously with implantoplasty (IP) compared to those treated without IP.

The objective of the present randomized clinical trial will be to compare two surgical methods of treating peri-implantitis. This study will determine if surgical debridement of peri-implantitis bone defects, including air decontamination of implant surfaces, in combination with the placement of a bone graft, differs in treatment outcomes compared to placing the same bone graft material with a resorbable collagen membrane placed over the bone graft.