
Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite Concentration on Success of Non-surgical Root Canal Treatment
Apical Periodontitis.There is no general agreement regarding the optimal concentration of sodium hypochlorite to be used in endodontic treatment.Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effect of sodium hypochlorite concentration on the success of primary root canal treatment. The study population comprised of patients requiring primary root canal treatment following the diagnosis of pulpal necrosis with chronic apical periodontitis in mature mandibular first and second molars.Patients were randomly allocated in either High concentration or Low concentration group.

Adjunct Photodynamic Therapy in Chronic Periodontitis Among Cigarette-smokers.
Chronic PeriodontitisSmokingThis study evaluates the efficacy of scaling and root planing with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in the treatment of chronic periodontitis (CP) among cigarette-smokers and never-smokers.

Periodontal Therapy in Thalassemia Major Patients
Thalassemia MajorChronic PeriodontitisThe study aims to evaluate the effect of local non surgical periodontal therapy on the systemic pro-inflammatory markers in the β-thalassemia (TM-β) patients with chronic periodontitis and systemically healthy demographically matched controls with chronic periodontitis. Both groups will receive non surgical periodontal therapy.

Curcumin-Simvastatin-EDTA in the Treatment of Periodontitis
PeriodontitisAmong the root conditioning materials is the Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). EDTA exposes the collagen fibers on dentin surfaces and also enhances early cell colonization. Statins have an anti-inflammatory effect, inhibit the bone resorption and stimulate the bone formation. Curcumin is effective in preventing periodontal disease destruction by targeting both bacteria and host inflammatory cells. Curcumin has anti- inflammatory, antioxidant, anticarcinogenic, antiviral, and antimicrobial functions. This study will be carried out to examine the effect of simvastatin-curcumin paste following EDTA root surface etching when used in conjunction with open flap debridement treating deep periodontal pockets (suggesting that it may have positive effect)

Photodynamic Therapy Plus Root Debridement in Gum Disease Treatment V2
PeriodontitisGum disease is a common disease, which affects 45% of the UK adult dentate population. It is caused by bacteria in dental plaque, which produces inflammation and a deepening of the natural crevice between the gum and the tooth surface. A crevice of 3mm is considered to be within the normal range, but anything ≥4mm is considered to be abnormal and is called a "pocket". Standard treatment of gum disease is mechanical cleaning aimed at removing bacteria off the root surfaces of the teeth. For most teeth, in the majority of patients, this can be achieved by root surface debridement (RSD), which involves passing instruments into the gum pockets to clean the roots. Previous studies have shown that the outcome of treatment is less effective when the pockets are deeper, or where there is bone or root anatomy which makes access for RSD difficult. In such instances additional approaches, such as repeating RSD, surgical access, or the additional use of antibiotics are considered. This clinical study will investigate the benefits and drawbacks of using a light source and dye (photodynamic therapy - PDT) as an additional treatment compared to the standard treatment of RSD alone. Patients with chronic gum problems who have undergone 1 cycle of RSD, but have residual pockets will be invited to join the study. All residual pockets will be treated with the conventional treatment of RSD. Following a random allocation process the residual pockets in half the mouth will receive additional treatment with PDT at the same appointment. Patients will be followed up for 3 months to evaluate the clinical benefits and any side effects. The aim of the study is therefore to evaluate if this localised, simple treatment can add benefit to RSD alone, thus reducing the need for antibiotics or surgery to treat residual pockets.

Effects of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy on Regeneration of Class II Furcation Lesions
PeriodontitisChronic2 moreThe aim of this study is to evaluate the additional effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy regeneration treatment of mandibular furcation lesions when associated to bovine bone and porcine collagen membrane.

Evaluation of Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1α as a Periodontal Disease Biomarker
Periodontitis Chronic Generalized SevereGingivitis1 morePeriodontal disease is a chronic progressive state of inflammation pertaining to supporting tissues of the dentition that culminates in loss of the affected teeth. Currently, diagnosis and monitoring of periodontal disease progression is accomplished by performing a full-mouth clinical and radiological examination which is time-consuming and also requires elaborate infrastructure and equipment, which are not always available. Limitations of the conventional diagnostic techniques necessitate the development of point-of-care testing (POCT) which could serve as a rapid, feasible and affordable screening tool for periodontal disease.MIP-1α is a cysteine-cysteine (C-C) chemokine that is secreted by a variety of cells like macrophages, fibroblasts, epithelial cells and endothelial cells. They principally serve to recruit leukocytes like monocytes, T lymphocytes, natural killer cells, dendritic cells and granulocytes to the site of inflammation. Hence, the current study has a two fold aim; first, to determine the feasibility of MIP-1α as a periodontal disease biomarker; and second, to correlate the value of MIP-1α obtained from oral rinse sample with the periodontal disease severity.

Hydroxyapetite Nanoparticles, Tricalcium Phosphate Nanoparticles, and PRF for Treatment of Gingival...
PeriodontitisThe aim of the present study was to compare between nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate carried on PRP membrane in treatment of Miller's class 1 gingival recession in human.

Comparison of Gingival Flap Procedure Using Conventional Surgical Loupes vs. Videoscope for Visualization...
Periodontal DiseasesPeriodontal Pocket5 moreThis study is being performed to compare different methods of visualization during routine gum surgery. The gum surgery is standard of care. This study will compare the use of a small camera (videoscope) in conjunction with magnification glasses during surgery vs. surgery only using magnification glasses. Both methods are routinely used and are standard of care methods of visualization. The small camera (videoscope) is a device which allows us to see the area under high magnification and projects live video feed on a computer screen. The study is a split-mouth design pilot study. The patients are only receiving treatment that was previously diagnosed prior to entering the study. The treatment performed is standard treatment that fits in the routine standard of care. No interventional treatment is being performed. The only difference is the method of visualization/observation by the practitioner used during the surgical procedure. One side of the mouth will be treated with just loupes while the other side of the mouth will be treated with loupes and the videoscope.

Assessment Of Healing After Periodontal Flap Surgery With And Without The Use Of Placental Extracts...
Periodontal DiseasesPeriodontal Pocket1 moreAll 16 chronic periodontitis (CP) subjects were clinically examined regarding the following clinical periodontal parameters: plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding index (BI), Pocket Probing Depth (PPD) and Relative Attachment Loss (RAL) which were recorded for all patients at baseline and 3 months after surgical periodontal treatment. Pre- surgical procedure: After the clinical parameters were recorded, Phase I therapy (full mouth scaling, root planning and oral hygiene instructions) was carried out. The patients were then put under observation to assess the oral hygiene practice and the response of the gingival tissue to Phase I therapy. After two weeks, patients were recalled and based on further treatment protocol, periodontal flap surgery was planned. Group A (Test Group) underwent periodontal flap surgery during which placental extract was applied. Group B (Control Group) underwent periodontal flap surgery alone. Surgical procedure The operative sites were anaesthetized with 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:180000). Crevicular incisions were made using Bard Parker No.15 blade on the facial and lingual/palatal surface of each tooth segment or area involved. A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was reflected using periosteal elevator taking care to preserve the maximum amount of tissue in the flap. After exposure the granulation tissue was removed, the root surfaces were planed and the flap was trimmed of tissue tags to facilitate healing. The flap was approximated using interrupted sutures (mersilk 3-0) and a periodontal dressing was placed above it. Local delivery of the placental extract In group A patients (test group) after open flap debridement 1ml of human placental extracts gel (Placentrex - the original research product of Albert David Limited, India, a drug obtained from fresh term healthy human placentae) was dispensed in a dappen dish. Gelatin foam (Abgel, Sri Gopal Krishna Labs, Pvt.Ltd. India) was cut into small beads of 1 sq.mm and allowed to soak in the placental gel for a few seconds. These gelatin beads soaked in gel are placed into the surgical site locally with the help of a graft carrier and condensed into the defect area. To prevent uncontrolled spill-over effects of the gel, mild pressure was applied over the flap with the wet gauze and excess gel was removed and Coe Pak was placed. While in group B(control group), after open flap debridement, this step is omitted. Post-operative care Antibiotics and analgesics are prescribed two times a day for five days. Patients were instructed to refrain from chewing hard or sticky foods, brushing near the treated areas or using any interdental aids for 1 week. The use of mouthwash was avoided during the observation period. All patients were placed on a strict maintenance schedule following surgery. The sutures were removed 10 days later. Recall appointments were scheduled once in 10 days for the 1st month. At every recall appointment, oral hygiene was checked. At 3rd month, the clinical parameters were recorded in both the groups. The difference between pre and post-operative values was assessed and then statistically analysed