Active clinical trials for "Periodontitis"

The purpose of this study is to characterize the effect of minocycline microspheres (MM) administered as an adjunct to scaling and rooting planning (SRP) on the subgingival community composition and metatranscriptome functional profile, in comparison to a group treated with SRP only and to periodontally-healthy subjects.

Loss of masticatory function consequent to tooth loss is associated with changes in food choices and insufficient nutrition intake. To date, studies showed no significant improvement in nutrient intake with interventions based solely on dental prostheses. Pilot studies have shown positive impacts of interventions combining implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis with brief dietary interventions. The relative contribution and the potential synergy of the components of such interventions need to be determined as it has major public health implications for the community-dwelling ageing population that continues to disproportionately suffer from tooth loss and its consequences. This study tests the effect of rehabilitation of masticatory function with fixed implant supported dentures and diet re-education on the dietary intake and nutrition in older subjects with terminal dentition (stage IV periodontitis) or full edentulism. A 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial of eligible adult (≥60 years) with loss of masticatory function consequent to full arch edentulism or terminal dentition (n = 120) will be conducted to test whether the rehabilitation of masticatory function with fixed implant supported dentures, diet re-education and/or their combination improves the diet and nutrition of ageing subjects. The study has been designed to detect changes in fruit and vegetable intake at 4 months using the 24-hour dietary recall method. Changes in protein as percentage of total energy, nutritional biomarkers, metabolomics, oral and gut microbiome, quality of life and masticatory function will also be assessed.

The purpose of the present study is to determine: 1) the efficacy of 2 periodontal surgical procedures, the conservative simplified papilla preservation technique and the more resective open flap debridement with osseous recontouring, in the treatment of chronic periodontitis in terms of clinical, radiographic, microbiological, immunological and PROMs, comparing them to non-surgical subgingival debridement and 2) if possible, determine the surgical procedure which leads to pocket elimination or to the lowest number of residual pockets.

The present study pretends to show the results of combining a modification of the Non-incised papillae surgical approach (NIPSA) attempting to improve the outcome in the treatment of teeth with advanced periodontal support loss.

This study is designed to evaluate the use of Emdogain® MI in a procedure where a significant portion of the lining of the sulcus is removed by curettage (similar to the traditional clinical procedure described as "gingival curettage") to the point of tissue mobility. This will be designated as a "non-incised minimally invasive flap access procedure". A videoscope will be utilized to assist with the requirement to adequately visualize and debride the root surface. This research project will define the approach used as a "non-incised minimally invasive flap access" approach and will be a modification of recognized minimally invasive techniques. This modification will be made by Dr. Harrel who first describe the minimally invasive periodontal approach and defined minimally invasive periodontal procedures in 1995.

With consideration of the previous studies regarding the properties of i-PRF, it will be used in combination with another bioactive material: (Nano-BAG) versus using of i-PRF only as a pulpotomy material with using a premixed bioceramic putty as a coronal sealing material in both cases, to evaluate if there is a difference in the success rate of pulpotomy in case of using Nano-BAG in combination with i-PRF So, in this study the investigators will use Nano-BAG in combination with i-PRF as a material for pulpotomy in cases of mature permanent mandibular molars and compare its outcomes with using i-PRF only and in both cases pulpotomy material will be covered with a layer of premixed bioceramic putty for coronal sealing.

A double-blind randomized-controlled clinical trial is conducted in order to evaluate the impact of non-surgical periodontal treatment on endothelial dysfunction parameters in subjects with periodontitis and without any cardiovascular disease.

Periodontal phenotype has been recognized as one of the key factors that may potentially impact the outcome of a variety of periodontal surgical and non-surgical procedures. Taking into consideration the inconsistent findings of the studies done in this regard,outcomes of scaling and root planing with respect to periodontal phenotype. With this aim, the present study would be conducted to assess the influence of periodontal phenotype on outcome of scaling and root planing in periodontitis patients.

This is a 12-month longitudinal, double-blind, parallel-design randomized controlled clinical trial involving surgical therapeutic intervention (Phase 4). It will include 50 participants aged 21 diagnosed with periodontitis (Stage III/IV, Grade A or B), divided into a Test Group (n=25, Minimally invasive single-flap surgery) and a Control Group (n=25, Minimally invasive double-flap surgery). The objective of this randomized, double-blind clinical study is to compare clinical, radiographic, and patient-centered outcomes between minimally invasive single-flap and double-flap techniques in treating isolated infra-bony defects. Twenty-five patients will be treated using the single-flap approach, and 25 patients will receive the double-flap elevation technique. Clinical parameters (plaque and bleeding scores, probing depth, gingival recession, clinical attachment level, and papillary dimensions), digital measurements (changes in gingival margin and papillary volume), radiographic assessments, and patient-centered outcomes (VAS scale) will be evaluated immediately before surgery, at 6 and 12 months post-procedure, while early healing will be assessed after 1 and 2 weeks following the procedures. Mean values and standard deviations will be calculated for each variable, normal distribution will be tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and comparisons will be conducted using Student's t-test and one-way ANOVA. A significance level of 5% will be used for all analyses.

Three techniques for periodontal reconstruction will be compared, in which marginal access versus apical access will be carried out.