Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
Rectal CancerThis study is designed to evaluate the short-term and long-term results after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for the resection of mid and low rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision(LaTME).
Long Term Bowel Function Following Rectal Cancer Surgery
Bowel; Functional SyndromeRectal CancerIn this longitudinal study, 171 patients were evaluated and compared based on the radiation therapy they received. Bowel function was assessed longitudinally with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Wexner scores every 6 months after restoration of bowel continuity. Patients with at least two follow-up visits were included.
Laparoscopic Surgery or Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer...
Recurrent Rectal CancerStage I Rectal Cancer2 moreRATIONALE: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery may be a less invasive type of surgery for rectal cancer and may have fewer side effects and improve recovery. It is not yet known whether robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is more effective than laparoscopic surgery in treating patients with rectal cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial studies robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery to see how well it works compared to laparoscopic surgery in treating patients with rectal cancer that can be removed by surgery.
Sunitinib Malate and Combination Chemotherapy as Front-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic...
Colorectal CancerMetastatic CancerRATIONALE: Sunitinib malate may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth and by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan hydrochloride, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) together with sunitinib malate may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving sunitinib malate together with combination chemotherapy works as front-line therapy in treating patients with metastatic rectal cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.
Evaluating The Response to Pre-Operative Chemotherapy and/or Radiation Therapy For Rectal Cancer...
Rectal CancerTraditional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is a technique used to help determine the stage of rectal cancer. All patients at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center with rectal cancer have an ultrasound at the beginning of their treatment to accurately determine the depth of penetration (how deep into the rectal wall the tumor goes) and lymph node involvement of their tumor. This information helps determine the best way to treat the patient's disease. Three-dimensional TRUS (3-D TRUS) is a new form of ultrasound that gives us all of the information of traditional ultrasound in addition to being able to view the tumor in 3-dimensions. This image can be stored and analyzed to evaluate the tumor size and volume as well as determine the unique shape of the tumor. Chemoradiotherapy before surgery is considered standard of care for most rectal cancers. Currently, there is no accurate way to determine whether or not the tumor has responded to the pre-operative radiation therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the response of rectal cancer to pre-operative chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy using 3-D TRUS to measure the volume of the tumor before and after chemoradiotherapy.
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection For Large Rectal Adenomas...
RECTAL NEOPLASMSObjective: Recent non-randomized studies suggest that extended endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is equally effective in removing large rectal adenomas as transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). If equally effective, ESD might be a more cost-effective approach as this strategy does not require expensive equipment, general anesthesia and hospital admission. Furthermore, ESD appears to be associated with fewer complications. In a randomized trial we will compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of TEM and ESD for the resection of large rectal adenomas. Study design: 15 centers will participate in this multicenter randomized trial comparing TEM versus ESD. Study population: Patients with a large rectal adenoma (≥2cm), located between 2 and 15 cm from the anal verge. Invasive cancer is excluded by histopathology and endoscopic ultrasonography. Patients must be in a health condition that permits general anesthesia. Interventions: Patients will be randomized between a. TEM: under general anesthesia b. ESD under sedation a TEM tube will be inserted in the rectum. With specialized instruments the adenoma will be dissected en bloc by a full thickness excision, after which the patient will be admitted to the hospital. an endoscope will be inserted into the rectum and the submucosa underneath the lesion will be injected with saline to lift the adenoma. With an endoscopic knife (Insulated Tip Knife, Olympus or Water Jet, Erbe) the lesion will be resected through the submucosal plane in an eb-bloc fashion, after which the patient will be observed for at least 24h in-hospital. Primary Endpoint: incidence of recurrence at 12 months Secondary Endpoints: morbidity, subdivided into major (requiring surgery) and minor (requiring endoscopic or medical intervention) anorectal function. disease specific and general quality of life; number of days not spent in hospital from initial treatment until 2 years afterwards; adenoma Sample size: Assuming a comparable baseline recurrence rate for TEM and ESD of 6% and considering an upper limit of 10% for ESD to be non-inferior (beta-error 0.2 and one-sided alpha-error 0.05), 60 patients are needed per group. These numbers provide sufficient power to reveal relevant differences in expected morbidity and in number of days not spent in hospital. Economic evaluation: A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of ESD against TEM for large rectal adenomas from a societal perspective with respectively the costs per recurrence free patient and the cost per quality adjusted life year as primary outcome measures.
Lymphoseek® as Lymphoid Tissue Targeting Agents in Colon Cancer(CNC)
Colon CancerRectal Cancer45 patients undergoing a colon (large bowel/intestine)removal operation for the diagnosis of colon cancer will be included in this study. During colon operation the affected portion of the colon is removed. In addition, lymph nodes are included in the specimen and evaluated by a pathologist. Analysis of the lymph nodes in the specimen are important because this is an important aspect of determining the stage of the cancer. Once the standard technique is used for the colon removal operation and the specimen is removed it will be injected with two drugs to help identify the lymph nodes. One is a blue dye and the other a radiotracer. The colon and ALL of the lymph nodes will then be sent for the standard pathologic evaluation. The patient themselves will never be injected with these drugs being used for research. Following the standard lymph node evaluation, an additional pathologist at an outside research facility will further examine the lymph nodes in the specimen using more in depth techniques which are above and beyond the standard of care. The results of all the pathologic tests will be conveyed to the surgeon of record to help in their decision making regarding further treatment. The study hypothesis is that radiotracer will be at least as effective as blue dye in identifying the lymph nodes most likely to harbor cancer cells (sentinel nodes). Once identified, these sentinel nodes can then undergo a more in depth review leading to improved staging of colorectal cancer and more accurate treatment.
Visualization of Rectal Cancer During Endoscopy, Using a Fluorescent Tracer
Rectal CancerTo improve rectal cancer management, there is a need for better visualization of drug targets in rectal cancer to identify patients who might benefit from specific targeted treatments. Molecular imaging of rectal cancer associated targets is a promising technique to accommodate this need. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), which is differentially expressed in normal versus malignant colon tissue, has proven to be a valid target for molecular imaging. Fluorescent labeling of bevacizumab (a VEGF targeting humanized monoclonal antibody currently used in anti-cancer therapy) using IRDye800CW (a fluorescent dye) has potential advantages in view of safety, infrastructure, costs, stability and imaging resolution. Therefore, the fluorescent tracer bevacizumab-IRDye800CW has been developed at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) and was recently approved to be administered to patients in a tracer dose. To detect this tracer in vivo in patients with colorectal cancer, a newly developed flexible near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence endoscope and optoacoustic endoscope have been developed which can be used in clinical studies. Optical fluorescence imaging may support response evaluation following chemoradiotherapy and give insight which patient might benefit from anti-VEGF targeted therapy in future studies.
Multiple Firings in Double-stapled Colorectal Anastomosis
Rectal CancerMultiple linear stapler firings during double stapling technique (DST) is associated with anastomotic leakage (AL) after laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR). We aim to investigate the risk factors and then to develop a deep learning model to predict the usage of ≥3 linear stapler cartridges during DST anastomosis.
Development of a Genome-based Platform for Personalized Treatment in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer...
Locally Advanced Rectal CancerThis study is aimed to develop a genome-based platform to predict patients who can achieve pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer. The main treatments for locally advanced rectal cancer is surgical removal such as lower anterior resection after neoadjuvant CCRT. About 10-40% of patients showed pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant CCRT. Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) is used to grade the histologic tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment. TRG 1 represents the pathologic complete response and TRG2 as histologically small group of cancer cells. Accordingly, TRG1 and 2 are expressed as good responder. Even though the surgery is being performed as an essential treatment, there are various surgery-related sequelae such as colostomy. Also, in some patients, surgery may be refused or surgery may not be performed due to an underlying disease. About 15-20% of local recurrence was reported in patients who did not undergo surgery and the 3-year survival rate was 96.6%. Colorectal cancer genetically can be divided into 4-subtypes. With the recent development of genome testing technology, genome analysis has been actively conducted in colorectal cancer. The most commonly known genetic subtype of colorectal cancer is classified into a total of 4 types as consensus molecular subtype (CMS); CMS1, CMS2, CMS3, CMS4. However, this was analyzed in colorectal cancer patients who did not undergo radiotherapy. There is no data regarding the response to radiation therapy according to each genetic subtype. Therefore, classifying the subtypes through genomic analysis and studying the responsiveness to radiotherapy in each subtype is needed. In this study, we aimed to develop a platform that predicts pathologic tumor response after CCRT based on genomic information. Furthermore, being able to select patients who can wait-and-see without surgery using platform.