search

Active clinical trials for "Hypersensitivity"

Results 61-70 of 1774

Multimodal Approach in Patients With mHSPC. Randomized Trial of APA+ADT vs APA-ADT and Local Treatment...

Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC)

Italian multicenter study, will enroll ~566 pts with oligometastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer who are candidates to receive treatment with apalutamide. After 6 months from the start of treatment, patients will be randomized to receive local treatment based on the investigator's choice ( either one between primary radiotherapy or cytoreductive prostatectomy), in addition to apalutamide, or to continue just with medical therapy.

Recruiting34 enrollment criteria

IMGN853 With Carboplatin in Second-line Treatment of FRα Expressing, Platinum-sensitive Epithelial...

High Grade Ovarian CancerPrimary Peritoneal Cancer1 more

IMGN853-0420 is a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study of carboplatin plus mirvetuximab soravtansine followed by mirvetuximab soravtansine continuation in folate receptor-alpha positive, recurrent platinum sensitive, high-grade epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer following 1 prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy.

Recruiting51 enrollment criteria

A Study of Abemaciclib (LY2835219) With Abiraterone in Men With Prostate Cancer That Has Spread...

Prostatic NeoplasmsNeoplasm Metastasis18 more

The purpose of this study is to learn whether adding abemaciclib to abiraterone plus prednisone prolongs the time before prostate cancer gets worse. Participation may last approximately 60 months.

Recruiting15 enrollment criteria

Oncolytic Adenovirus TILT-123 With Pembrolizumab as Treatment for Ovarian Cancer

Platinum-refractory Ovarian CarcinomaPlatinum-resistant Ovarian Cancer7 more

This is an open-label, phase 1, dose-escalation, multicenter and multinational trial evaluating the safety of oncolytic adenovirus TILT-123 in combination with Pembrolizumab in patients with platinum resistant or refractory ovarian cancer.

Recruiting35 enrollment criteria

The Association of CPP-ACPF Associated With LASER in the Treatment of Tooth Sensitivity After at...

SensitivityTooth

Tooth whitening is a procedure that has been increasingly requested by patients around the world, whether at home or in office bleaching. Tooth sensitivity is the main side effect of bleaching. It have a great power to interfere negatively in the quality of life of those affected. According to the literature, about 51% of people who had at-home bleaching developed postoperative sensitivity. The objective of this clinical, randomized, double-blind study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the association of casein phosphopeptides-fluoridated amorphous calcium phosphate with photobiomodulation in the treatment of tooth sensitivity after home bleaching, with 22% carbamide peroxide and also evaluate the effectiveness of at home bleaching through color analysis. For develop this study, 50 patients will be selected, with no previous history of sensitivity, aged between 18 and 30 years. They will be divided into four treatment groups: PLACEBO group; CPP-ACPF group; LASER group; LASER+CPP-ACPF group. Home bleaching treatment will use 22% carbamide peroxide. Patients should use two hours a day for 21 days. The desensitizing treatments will be applied in four moments, according to the group of each patient: before starting the bleaching treatment; after one week of the bleaching treatment; after two weeks of whitening treatment and after three weeks of whitening treatment. Sensitivity will be assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), where patients should daily mark their pain level (from 0 to 10) on each side of the arcade. After the 21 days of treatment, they will receive a new VAS, to evaluate if was any sensitivity will occur during 30 days after the bleaching treatment. In parallel with bleaching treatment and sensitivity treatment, the color analysis of teeth 13, 11, 21 and 23 will be performed, with the Vita Easyshade Advance 4.0 spectrophotometer, to monitor the bleaching performance, in each week. The first one will occur before starting the bleaching treatment (baseline) and a new measurement will be performed every week, together with the application of treatments for sensitivity. The collected data will be tabulated in an Excel Microsoft Windows 2010) spreadsheet and analyzed in the Jamovi 1.6.23 (The Jamovi Project, 2020) software. For inter- and intra-group analysis of sensitivity values, the Repeated Measures statistical test will probably be used. For all statistical analyses, a significance level of 5% will be adopted.

Recruiting13 enrollment criteria

Efficacy and Safety of QGE031 (Ligelizumab) in Patients With Peanut Allergy

AllergyPeanut

This is a 52-week, Phase 3 multi-center, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of two dosing regimens of ligelizumab (240 mg and 120 mg) subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks (SCq4w) in participants with a medically confirmed diagnosis of IgE-mediated peanut allergy.

Recruiting12 enrollment criteria

Sodium Stibogluconate in the MDS/AML With One of the 65 Defined p53 Mutations

Myelodysplastic SyndromesAcute Myeloid Leukemia4 more

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Sodium Stibogluconate in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML) with p53 mutation from a defined list. The list includes 65 p53 mutations that were experimentally confirmed to be pharmacologically restored with tumor-suppressive function by antimonials.

Recruiting23 enrollment criteria

Dupilumab and Milk OIT for the Treatment of Cow's Milk Allergy

Allergies Food Milk

This is a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, 2 arm study in approximately 40 subjects aged 4 to 50 years, inclusive, who are allergic to cow's milk. The primary objective is to assess whether dupilumab as an adjunct to milk oral immunotherapy (OIT) compared to placebo improves the safety of milk OIT and rates of desensitization, defined as an increase in the proportion of subjects who pass a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) to at least 2040 mg cumulative milk protein at week 18.

Recruiting23 enrollment criteria

Clinical Study Using Biologics to Improve Multi OIT Outcomes (COMBINE)

HypersensitivityFood Allergy4 more

Food allergy (FA) is a serious public health concern that causes potentially-life threatening reactions in affected patients. The prevalence of food allergy in the United States (U.S.) has increased substantially and now affects 15 million patients:4-8% of children (6 million children, 30% with multiple food allergies) and about 9% of adults. This is a prospective Phase 2, single-center, multi-allergen OIT study in participants with proven allergies to 2 or 3 different foods in which one must be a peanut. The total of participants in the clinical study will be 110, ages 4 to 55 years with a history of multiple food allergies of 2 to 3 different foods including peanut. Allergy will be confirmed by FA-specific IgE levels and positive skin prick test (SPT). Enrolled participants must be positive during the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Food challenge (DBPCFC) at or before the 300 mg (444 mg cumulative) dosing level of FA proteins.

Recruiting31 enrollment criteria

Trial of Rucaparib in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Harboring Germline...

Prostate Cancer Metastatic

The aim of this research is to find out if the study drug rucaparib leads to lowering of PSA levels in men with metastatic prostate cancer that has not yet been treated with androgen deprivation therapy (also referred to as metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer) and who have an inherited mutation in a gene involved in repairing DNA damage. The research will also examine if rucaparib is safe in individuals with metastatic prostate cancer. Prior research studies have shown that drugs like rucaparib can be of benefit to patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer who are resistant to androgen deprivation therapy AND who carry a mutation in a DNA repair gene. We are studying if rucaparib will be an effective treatment for these patients earlier in their treatment course (for example, prior to the start of medicines that lower testosterone level). It is unknown whether rucaparib will have the same benefit in men with metastatic prostate cancer carrying a mutation in a DNA repair gene, prior to the use of medicines that lower your testosterone level.

Recruiting39 enrollment criteria
1...678...178

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs