Active clinical trials for "Colorectal Neoplasms"

Anesthetic method was reported to have an impact on postoperative long-term outcome in cancer patients. In this study, we will investigate the effect of different anesthetic methods on NK cell activity, cytokine response and postoperative outcome in colorectal cancer patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC. We will compare propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with balanced anesthesia to determine the effect of propofol, inhalation agent, and opioid on tumor genesis, recurrence, NK cell activity, cytokine response, and postoperative outcome.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and one year disease-free survival of total or subtotal colectomy and proctocolectomy in stage IIIc and stage IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer (EOC, FTC, PPC).

To achieve an adequate visual working field during laparoscopic colorectal surgery without disturbance of the small intestine, patients are positioned in Trendelenburg position. This position results in hemodynamic changes which may increase the risk of cardiopulmonary complications and prolonged hospital stay. Recently, an intraoperative retractor sponge was introduced as alternative for the Trendelenburg position during laparoscopic surgery.

The optimum regimen of maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer （mCRC） is unknown. This study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of maintenance treatment with capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy plus Chinese Traditional Medicine. In this Prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial, the investigators will recruit 159 mCRC patients who have finished 18 to 24 weeks first-line chemotherapy and disease evaluation is SD, PR or CR. The patients will then accept Chinese traditional diagnosis and be randomised into two group, capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy only as control group and the metronomic chemotherapy plus Chinese Traditional Medicine as experimental group. This treatment regimen will be continued until progression, death, or an unacceptable adverse event. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL) and toxic effects.

The primary endpoint is to evaluate the Median disease progression free survival (mPFS).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CAR-T cell immunotherapy in patients with MUC1 positive relapsed or refractory solid tumor.

Phase II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of oral appliqued niclosamide in patients who are progressive with metachronous or synchronous metastases of colorectal cancer among the previous therapy (Nikolo). Monocentric open-label clinical trial of phase II. All patients received 2 g p.o. niclosamide daily until progression (according to RECIST) or unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation of study for other reasons.

This is an open label, multicenter, non-comparative, phase IV study of panitumumab monotherapy in Indian subjects with previously treated, wild-type Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) and wild-type Neuroblastoma rat sarcoma viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog (NRAS), metastatic colorectal cancer. This study is designed to fulfil the requirement of the Indian regulatory authority to characterize the safety and tolerability of panitumumab when administered to Indian subjects with wild-type KRAS and wild-type NRAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Approximately 58 Indian subjects with previously treated wild-type KRAS and wild-type NRAS, metastatic colorectal cancer will be enrolled in order to achieve the target enrollment of 50 evaluable subjects who have received at least one dose of panitumumab. Subjects will receive panitumumab 6 milligram/kilogram (mg/kg) intravenously every 14 days until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or death. All subjects will be followed at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after the last administration of panitumumab, unless the treatment was discontinued due to withdrawal of consent or death of the subject.

The study aims to identify the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in patients with local advanced colorectal cancer.

Compared with traditional open colectomy, laparoscopic surgery is associated with less pain, earlier recovery, and better cosmetic outcome, and its short- and long-term oncologic outcomes have been demonstrated. In experienced surgeons' hands, single incision laparoscopic surgery is increasingly performed for colorectal disease, and even for malignant lesion because of its reduced incision-associated morbidity and scarring. However, the safety and efficacy of single incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer has not yet been evaluated. Thus, the prospective randomized trial comparing single incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is needed.