Active clinical trials for "Periodontitis"

A comparison of laser (REPaiR) compared with minimally invasive surgical therapy for moderate to severe periodontal disease.

Periodontal regeneration can change tooth prognosis and represents an alternative to extraction in teeth compromised by severe intrabony defects. The aim of this study is to compare periodontal regeneration (PR) with tooth extraction and replacement (TER) in a population with attachment loss to or beyond the apex of the root in terms of professional, patient reported and economic outcomes.

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the regenerative potential of Advanced Platelet Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) and Bioactive Glass (Perioglas®) bone graft in the treatment of intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis patients.

45 sites in 15 patients with periodontal pockets ≥ 5mm were selected. These selected sites were divided into 3 groups as Group A, B and C.

Children often damage their front teeth. In approximately 6% of cases, the nerve inside the affected tooth dies (becomes 'non-vital') and natural root development stops. In these cases, the tooth requires a root canal treatment in order to prevent problems such as pain and dental abscesses from arising. However, because the roots of these young teeth are not fully formed, they are weaker and prone to fracture. In addition, root canal treatment is difficult because a root canal filling cannot be placed in a tooth which is not yet fully formed, due to the fact that the root has an 'open' end. To enable root canal treatment to be carried out, a 'barrier' must be placed at the end of the 'open' root. This can be done using materials called Calcium Hydroxide or Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). These materials are placed inside the root and sealed into the tooth. However, although they help to provide a barrier, they do not help to strengthen the walls of the root. Treatment with these materials requires multiple visits to the dentist, over a period of up to 18 months. There is evidence to suggest that an alternative treatment involving 'revascularisation' (recovery of the blood supply to the tooth) and the use of a triple antibiotic paste allows 'natural' root growth to restart, and also strengthens the walls of the root. Treatment can often be carried out in just two visits. The aim of this study is to discover whether there is a difference between one of two methods of treating non-vital teeth with open ends. It is thought that there will be no significant differences seen between the results of the two techniques. Children with teeth that fall into this category and require root canal treatment will be given one of two treatments, both of which aim to treat infection, close the root end and to allow healing to take place. Teeth will receive one of the following methods of root treatment: Revascularisation (recovery of the natural blood supply to the tooth) following placement of an antibiotic paste into the tooth root. The aim of this treatment is to allow 'natural' root growth to restart. Root growth will allow the tooth to form at barrier at the end of the root. No root canal filling will then be necessary. Closure of the open root end by placement of an artificial barrier at the end of the root so that a root canal filling can then be placed. This will be done with a dental material called Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Non-vital teeth with an open end are routinely treated in this way at Liverpool Dental Hospital.

The main objective of this study is the prevention and repair of apical periodontitis in lower molars with pulp necrosis after the execution of endodontic treatment in one or two visits in adolescent patients. Moreover, it is also observed the frequency of postoperative pain in endodontic treatment.

This study evaluated the regenerative potential of rhBMP-2 gel in intrabony defects when compared to sticky bone (control).

The present study evaluated clinically and radiographically the regenerative potential of rhBMP-2 in absorbable sponge and PRF in Grade II furcation.

This study compared the clinical outcomes of the non-incised papila surgical approach (NIPSA) alone and with grafting biomaterial.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the oral neutrophil numbers (ONN) in saliva, the level of matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and the periodontal parameters in smokers and non-smokers with periodontitis, before and after nonsurgical periodontal treatment (NSPT). Materials and method: 40 periodontitis patients including 20 smokers and 20 non-smokers were enrolled in this study. All patients were received the NSPT included instructing oral hygiene, scaling and root planning. Clinical parameters (plaque index (PlI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment loss (CAL)), ONN and GCF MMP-8 level were assessed before (baseline) and after NSPT 1 month and 3 months.